From the category archives:

Social Media

This is a post I have been meaning to write for a while.  What has prompted me to pull my finger out is that I have increasingly found myself screaming WTF?! all too often and becoming quite frustrated with the lack of good planning when it comes to campaigns and communications, particularly when Facebook is selected as a core part of the campaign.  Let me explain…

I recently went away on a holiday with my pals.  There were 5 of us.  All of us have smart phones.  3 of us are on Facebook.  I use Facebook frequently.  My other two friends use Facebook just to check photos and status updates.  The two non-Facebookers: 1 has recently stopped using Facebook as he has migrated to Twitter and the other has no social profiles at all.  He is a Dr, 29 years of age, clever guy, owns an iPhone, an iPad and is very tech savvy but chooses not to ‘engage’ via social networks.  He shows a surprising interest in what I’m currently working on (my other friends at this point have now have slipped into a coma).  His main question was “will I miss out by not being on Facebook, in the future”.  Now, this question interested me as I was reminded of a comment made at a Facebook conference I attended a few weeks back.  According to the Facebook spokesperson, in 5 years time Facebook hopes to be present on every website, via Facebook connect or Like buttons that you can embed alongside page elements.  So curiously I asked my friend “what makes you say that?”
“Well, I’ve noticed within the last few weeks, TV ads and billboards do not include the website address anymore, they point people to Facebook for more info, and I do not use Facebook, so will I miss out?”  Bingo!

When it comes to campaigns, it is vital that all marketing communications clearly display how to get in touch, find out more info, and/or make a purchase via telephone, website and now Twitter or Facebook.
8 years ago when I was developing print ads, radio ads, etc… a time when broadband adoption was increasing and more people were using the net, I never, ever, considered removing the call centre number and only include the web address to purchase.  I can hear my director now screaming “it’s commercial suicide” and quite rightly so, as the majority of our sales were done via telephone rather than the net.  We were a broadband provider, so the majority of customers who were purchasing did not have a broadband connection yet, and many did not even have immediate access to an Internet connection (sometimes not even dial-up!), so telephone was the easiest way to get the sale.  We even had an excellent call centre team and support forums (yes, believe it or social media was used before Twitter) for both prospective and existing customers when they engaged with us.

Which brings me back to my main point…  I’m now going to refer to a recent campaign in the UK that would have cost millions in above the line spend, that shall remain nameless, and in my opinion has taken one step forward in social media but now two steps back with Facebook.  They have provided me with a WTF? moment and they are not the only ones.

The brand’s recent ad features some very well known celebrities, and as brand ambassadors they appeal perfectly to the target audience of 16-35.  At the end of the ad the call to action is to ‘Search Facebook’ for the product.  No website address, just the Facebook search term.  Now, we all get that in the UK there are 30 million users on Facebook (realistically the product’s target audience is a fraction of this), and I’m sure you’ve shared the socialnomicsvideo and had a little wee over the stats, but here’s the rub.  In order to get involved with the product’s Facebook page you need to like the page first, which to me immediately puts up a barrier, especially when as a prospective customer all you want is to find out more info.  I don’t have to add Amazon.com as a bookmark before I can search for books, so why should I become a fan of a page immediately?  Equally, if arriving via Facebook mobile app on iPhone, you cannot see the flashy landing tab which you can experience via PC/Laptop, and furthermore the wall posts are random (I’ll come to that later).
If you decide you want to be a fan, you then are presented with info about an exclusive download.  If you want this piece of content you have to enter your e-mail, again why did I become a fan? The exclusive content is a great piece of social currency, but surely the main message should be about the awesome product, it’s price, at the same time providing exciting on-topic discussions about the product, allowing the customer to get involved in the conversation.

Because the brand in question decided to exclude non Facebook users, they should have ensured that they are maximising the potential of those customers who do use Facebook, and ultimately convert these fans into customers.  But, unfortunately you cannot get the price or specs of the product within Facebook.
Upon closer inspection, there’s a product info tab where I’m immediately presented with the cool TV ad.  But, I’ve already seen the ad, I just want to know what the cost is, and maybe have a chat with the brand or with someone who owns one?  Finally, I find the product portfolio lower down on the tab and decide that I want to get more info, so I click on the button, suddenly I’m then directed to the product website for more info!!!!  Now, I might be stating the obvious, but you selected Facebook as the primary destination where I’ll be able to find everything I need, I gave you a Facebook like for this, not to be taken out of the environment and be directed to your site?

And this is my WTF?? moment.  Why did the brand not include the web url on their ads alongside their Facebook page url, as ultimately, this is where you end up to actually find more info and pricing?  Surely when planning the campaign, and the decision was made that all customers are to be directed to Facebook, someone might have stuck their hand up and said “this is quite a long user journey, which we hope to convert to sales, I’m worried it will not deliver?!”  Little wonder some Financial Directors are questioning the value of Facebook, especially when selected as the main customer touch point using millions of pounds of media spend.

In short, I personally feel there is definitely a need for better planning and user experience when it comes to social media, and especially if using Facebook as the primary destination as your call to action.  We have in the past meticulously planned user journeys for landing pages on sites/micro sites directing prospective and existing customers to content via campaign creative, so why would you not plan user journeys and content schedules for Facebook?

Furthermore, we need to plan how to continuously engage fans when they arrive, with on topic content that will engage and convert.  I totally get that in 5 years time Facebook could possibly dominate the web, and that the need for a healthy fan base/community is important.  But, we have not reached that point just yet.

{ 8 comments }

Yury Lifshits and Yahoo Labs have recently released their Facebook Like Log Study and it is well worth a look into what news stories consumers engage with.

The study is an analysis of how Facebook users interacted with 100,000+ articles across some of the leading online media outposts.

Understanding content popularity; more specifically what content motivates your consumers to engage with, is an essential part of content strategy.  This study helps to illustrate the importance of demand analytics, as well as social media optimization.

Key take outs from the study are: placing more marketing effort behind the most popular stories.  Analysing and using specific words/phrases for your content e.g. news/blog posts.

There is nothing revolutionary in the study in terms of recommendations, but it is very interesting to see what methodology has been applied to the data to produce this study.

My favourite take out is “for every 1000 visits to a news story, there are 5 to 20 likes and tweets.  Next time you want to guess pageviews of your competitors, multiply their like counts by 100.”

{ 1 comment }

 

It is very apt, that whilst I’m typing this blog post, I am sat here with laptop humming, iPhone buzzing and television playing all at the same time.  Although my girlfriend may not think I can multitask, I’m doing a damn fine job at it!  I digress…

Harvard Business Review have recently featured a slide deck on media consumption, with the focus on Internet audiences and multitasking with multiple screens. ‘How Internet Junkies Will Save Television‘ is an easy read with some interesting stats on the behaviour of television viewers, and definitely worth giving some thought on how best media touchpoints link together (convergence culture) using social media as the glue..?

{ 3 comments }

I would like to throw a little mobile marketing into the social media mix this month. After all, simple Darwinism applied to business thinking has proven how important it is to strive to keep ahead of the curve.

We should not ignore the impact that smartphones and social media are having on our lives. I for one probably use my smartphone more for web browsing, social networking, blogging and email beyond the workplace than I use my laptop.

Yes, this could well be early-adopter territory I’m speaking about but realistically I’m just one of 650 million people globally – according to eMarketer in March 2010 – who are now using their smartphones more and more for tasks such as email and social networking. This number is set to rocket due to the penetration of affordable smartphones within the market. Research from Comscore in December 2009 supports this theory – it found that 70 per cent of smartphone users have accessed email and 43 per cent have accessed social networks via their devices.

What is interesting is that email usage is up due to the social network usage on these devices. Research from ExactTarget has also discovered that social media and social networking have helped increase the use of email. The reason for this increase is that users of smartphones still want to keep in touch with their social network when ‘untethered’ and social networking sites use email and messaging as a way to encourage users to return.

Why convergence is key
It is not only important that we understand how new technologies affect our customers. At the same time we need to understand how they can be used to open up communication channels with them. This helps us to build stronger relationships, to attract new customers and to retain exisiting ones too.

Furthermore these technologies can complement one another, as the value of social media, mobile and indeed email combined can amount to a more successful campaign than when they are all executed individually, in silos. Here are a few key steps to take in order to optimise the success of integrated digital campaigns which include both mobile and social elements:

1. Make content mobile-accessible
First of all we should ensure that any digital content produced is accessible by all mainstream mobile devices. Many business decisions are made away from the office and as a result business persons use smartphone devices such as BlackBerrys, iPhones and Android phones to access information.

2. Optimise your e-newsletters
It is also advisable to add in the functionality to share content through LinkedIn groups, Twitter and your community sites, wherever possible. If customers receive emails via smartphone devices they can immediately carry out an action to share your content with their own social network, thereby helping to increase word-of-mouth marketing. They can also be taken directly to your forum or group where they can comment instantly on a particular topic or seek peer reviews and support.

3. Encourage interactivity at events
At events, look to offer SMS short codes inviting prospects to text for more information on a product or service, or even quick response (QR) codes. An example would be to offer a prospect the option to text to receive the latest video of a product demonstration. When the prospect texts it then automatically prompts them to enter an email address to receive digital content, thus building data within your CRM. This digital content again should be optimised to be shared immediately amongst social networks.

4. Consider an app
Banks now offer smartphone applications to manage business account information. Why not look into developing a mobile application for your customers so that they can manage their own accounts and orders? Furthermore you can look to run offers, promotional or discount codes for products and services through this application to your loyal customers.

Staying up-to-date
Beyond the above-outlined campaign activities I have stumbled across a tool called Gist: (www.gist.com). This is an application which helps manage your inbox and social network accounts to give you the latest information about business contacts and their social interactions. This is available as a mobile application, so it is useful from a B2B sales perspective as before a meeting you can be instantly alerted to a prospect’s lifestream, which can help you to stay up-to-date, keep your interactions relevant, and build deeper relationships.

In the various ways outlined above, marketers can develop their knowledge of the use of smartphones, social networks and emails. By combining this with a greater understanding of how we can apply these tools and technologies to our businesses, hopefully we can all aim to develop more successful, integrated and profitable business processes and digital campaigns.

{ 10 comments }

Jeremiah Owyang, a leading voice within social media and digital marketing, predicted that 2010 would be the year that social media needs to prove itself. Well, here we are in 2010 and now is the time we start to look at whether or not our investment into social media activities has actually proved fruitful.

Some marketers may claim that measuring the effectiveness of social media marketing is difficult, and in all honesty it is, but it is possible and should be done. Marketers who claim it is impossible are more than likely those who do not look at effectively measuring the impact of any or all marketing activity. Typically those businesses who are already measuring the success of social media are those focused on putting in place metrics for activities such as enewsletters, CRM, collateral, sponsorship, advertising and have a strong understanding of return on investment.

ROI of social media
We can easily measure website visitors driven directly from social media channels such as blogs and YouTube videos by using metrics software such as Google Analytics. The growth over time for number of Twitter followers can be measured by tools such as Twitter Counter and Twitter Anaylser. Facebook Insights and Nielson’s BrandLift provides us with similar data. If the previous tools mentioned are already being employed to measure social media activity, then this is great. If not, you should look to introduce social media measurement to your team’s weekly or monthly processes.
But, the aforementioned are all non-financial impacts on a business. This is why C-level executives find it difficult to truly understand the value of PR, advertising and social media activity.

Oliver Blanchard, a business strategist, has looked in depth at the ROI of social media, supporting the theory that social media needs to be measured in direct relation to the resource allocation. For all the investment into blogs, communities, Facebook and Twitter it makes sound business sense that a company should see the direct impact these activities are having on the P&L. After all, being able to quantify the success of a campaign or activity in relation to beefing up the bottom line ensures that you are re-allocated budgets to carry out the activity in order to sustain and grow market share.

So, how can we show that our social media marketing activity is actually delivering direct value to the bottom line? Well, we start with the above process of measuring the activity using tools and processes but we also compare this activity to other business data.

What we should be looking to do is plot social media activity against sales revenue, transactions, new customers, loyalty data and market research. By comparing and contrasting both sets of data, we will be able to see a correlation between whether or not marketing activity that includes social media has actually helped increased sales before and after social media activity was introduced. If the correlation is positive, and sales activity has increased during the time that social media activity was introduced, then we can ascertain that certain social media activity has had a positive effect.

Tools such as BrandWatch and Radian6 can also be used to visualise the volume of conversation around your product and service and then you can overlay sales data over the same timeline to see whether or not social media conversation for example correlates with an increase in sales.

Deep data diving - This type of activity is incredibly effective as we are able to ‘deep dive’ into the data to understand particular conversations and the sentiment around your business and service at a particular time such as positive and negative sales spikes.

For marketers it is a case of applying a little more depth to your measurement. For example, measuring the conversations you have had on LinkedIn that culminated in forming a relationship with a prospective customer to that prospect actually becoming a customer and what additional value that has added to your bottom line.

Measuring the Twitter conversations that you have entered into that may have resulted in a new client relationship and sale. Measure the investment of time on Twitter to win that client in comparison to time spent at a networking event. Yes the measurement is more complex but it is quantifiable none the less.

{ 3 comments }